War Poems War Poetry - 1443 Words

Soldiers often pay the ultimate price for a nation’s security. Fighting in battles throughout the centuries leads to countless deaths that define a country. In many nations soldiers often fall while enforcing their countries policies. There is no way possible in which a nation can thank a family of a fallen soldier enough. Death of a soldier leaves a nation with a vein of guilt deep within the core of the country. War poetry immortalizes the death of these soldiers in an attempt to forget about the brutality of conflict and to remove the grief that comes from sending your nation’s sons and daughters into combat. War poetry immortalizes soldiers in an attempt to keep the nation moving forward, to gain closure, and to paint a heroic image of†¦show more content†¦Heroism is common theme of war poetry. A heroic image serves as an aid in advancing the closure of the families, by offering that their sons died honorably. Immortalization of soldiers’ deaths as h eroic have helped justify the recruitment of a nation’s youngest adults for centuries. War poetry by different authors all seem to follow the same theme. In â€Å"Dead of ‘92† the author, Arthur Rimbaud, draws reference to the nobility of death of soldiers and to the immortalization of the fallen. In the following quote, â€Å"Oh soldiers, sown by death, your noble lover, in our old furrow you regenerate† the authors use of the word â€Å"noble† once again paints a picture of honor associated with death of soldiers (Rimbaud 8). Furthermore, the use of the word â€Å"furrow† references a trench or a crack. A trench correlates to the crack that a nation feels when their vein of guilt becomes too large. The vein of guilt cracks the nation. In addition to this, the author reference to guilt, the author uses the word â€Å"regenerate† leads to the connection of immortalization. By regenerating you can live on forever as does the memory of t he soldier in this poem. The soldier lives on for all eternity by regenerating itself in the guilt filled trench of the nation. The nobility of the soldier is immortalized throughout the poem by this line. Immortalization in â€Å"Dead of ‘92† along with many other poems throughout time has helpedShow MoreRelatedHow Poetry Can And Can Not Say Many Things957 Words   |  4 PagesPoetry can and cannot say many things in many ways. Poetry in the Twentieth Century pertaining to the Great War or the First World War gave people an idea about what poetry could say and could not say. Poetry during the First World War would often either conceal the true nature of the conflict going on or poetry would gruesomely paint the conflict for what it was worth. Robert Brooke’s â€Å"The Solider† conceals the First World War’s ultimate brutality by claiming it as a noble endeavor, Wilfred Owen’sRead MoreWar Poems954 Words   |  4 PagesWar is a time of viole nce, protest, death and pain for many people around the world. With this conflict, a lot of poetry is written because poetry is one of the most common ways for people to put across their feelings about situations. War is one of these situations for which many people have very strong feelings. A common theme in war poetry is the transformation that war brings about in a person. Many poems reveal boys going into war and becoming young men after the experience. Another dominantRead MoreUniversity Of Oxford English Professor, Dr. Stuart Lee1318 Words   |  6 Pagesthat the First World War was one of the seminal moments of the twentieth century in which literate soldiers, plunged into inhuman conditions, reacted to their surroundings in poems. Lee’s statement identifies the role played by First World War poetry played in not only commemorating the Great War but also allowing scholars to gain an insight into the brutalities of the conflict through this literature available. This essay will agree with the statement that First World War poetry has become one ofRead MoreSimilarities Between Rupert Brooke, Siegfried Sassoon, And Wilfred Owen1531 Words   |  7 PagesSenior High School World War I Poetry How it changed during the war Abby Schaubroeck Honors World Cultures Period 3 Ms. Beck 19 May 2017 Over the course of the war the perspective of literature, in specifically poetry, changed. Rupert Brooke, Siegfried Sassoon, and Wilfred Owen all share one common bond: these men were war poets. According to the Oxford Dictionary, the term â€Å"war poet† means â€Å"a poet writing at the time of and on the subject of war, especially one on military serviceRead MoreBritish World War I And Wilfred Owen s `` Anthem For Doomed Youth ``941 Words   |  4 PagesBritish World War I soldiers Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon both have a similar approach to World War I poetry, however, Owen is the more effective writer. Owen’s poetry is heavily influenced by Sassoon’s, but Sassoon’s poetry entails very gruesome imagery in great detail. In Owen’s poems, he describes the pleasures of life being deadened because of the war and denies the expectations of the war from society. Sassoon’s poems are far more depressing and visual with descriptive words but seem toRead MoreModern Poetry978 Words   |  4 Pagesis around now. Modern poetry is: à ¢â‚¬Å"For artists and writers, the Modernist project was a re-evaluation of the assumptions and aesthetic values of their predecessors† (http://www.poetryfoundation.org/learning/glossary-term/Modernism). Even poetry that has been around for centuries has a new twist and can be considered modern now. Everyone seems to want to move on and up in the world and to have the best, most influential things in their life for their future. Modern poetry really puts a spin on whatRead MoreThe Importance Of Reading Poetry1158 Words   |  5 PagesWhen we hear the word â€Å"poetry† it often triggers associated thoughts we relate to poetry. Throughout history poetry had been a major influence of every art movement and is known to capture emotions better than any other art form. As an introduction to the arts culture, Once a person is comfortable with reading poetry they begin to reach out and explore other art forms. The appreciation of any art requires the same critical thinking and emotional awareness as poetry, making poetry a great first step towardRead MoreCritical Analysis of Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy1660 Words   |  7 PagesAnalysis of Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy I. Introduction: 1. Introducing what is going to be discussed in the paper (analysis of Arms and the Boy , its relation to one of Owens poem). 2. Thesis Statement : Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy can be discussed to represent the horror of war. II. Body: 1. Owen was a soldier and a modern poet who was known as anti-war poet. A. A summary of Owens poetry in general . B. His representation of the horror of war in his poems. 2. Arms and the Boy isRead MorePoem Analysis : Sassoon s Poetry1493 Words   |  6 Pagesmovement of the First World War led to an extraordinary flowering of poetic talent. The influence of English war poet and soldier, Siegfried Sassoon, extended far beyond his own works. His journey through the conflict of war reflected a wider evolution of the literary world. I find that following the evolution of Sassoon’s poetry throughout his life contributes to the understanding of the reality of the ‘Great War for Civilisation’. Through his poetry, Sassoon exposed war as it really is – destructiveRead MoreThe Most Influential Moments Of The First World War1136 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction The First World War was one of the most influential moments of the twentieth century where literate soldiers fought in inhuman conditions and reacted to their surroundings through written words, most often poetry. Jessie Pope and Wilfred Owen were made famous by the poetry they wrote, about describing various war experiences. Both poets wrote from completely different perspectives of war. Jessie Pope born in Leicester (England) in 1868 was an English poet, writer and journalist who

Military strategist and conflict Free Essays

Roman versus Medieval Armies Comparing Roman and Medieval Anglo-Saxon armies posit certain novel challenges due to evolutionary changes in military techniques and strategy and the huge time gap of around two thousand years that separated them. For the purpose of study here, we will take into account the military strategy and style deployed by Roman armies of 200 BC, at a time when they constituted most overwhelming military force in the contemporary world and compare them with strategy, styles, techniques used by 13th century Medieval armies of England, France and Saxony. The Roman military strategies of warfare were based on traditions and experience that ran since more than 500 years, evolved through countless campaigns and wars. We will write a custom essay sample on Military strategist and conflict or any similar topic only for you Order Now Their beginning was humble, in form of a local armed tribe set to protect its geographical entity. However, over next centuries they acquired as they acquired skills and experience, they molded themselves in a massive invincible army that was reputed even among its enemies for its technical superiority and tenacity. Army layout: Roman army presented a fully hierarchical structure, like a modern day military, composed of various units and sub-units. Legions marked the largest and fundamental mass units of army with their strength totaling around 6000 men. Each legion was divided in cohorts   that were further subdivided in smaller units of maniples and centuries that comprised 100 soldiers on average. The legions stationed at front contained exclusively heavy infantry, comprising best and most skilled soldiers of the army. On any campaign the army moved through its legions and each of them were responsible for marching, encampment, logistics, and vigilance according to set standards of the army. Warfare strategy: Romans used numerous innovative and unique models within the scope of their traditional model of conducting warfare in triple lines. Hastati formed the first rank, placed closest to enemy lines, principes formed second line and triarii was the last rank that was typically kept as specialist reserved force. The army structure at battlefields was remarkably ordered, with frontline and rear units regularly placed in a way so as to leave no gap in the ranks. The three line system of Roman army provided it crucial maneuvering space, gave it depth and allowed it to bear initial losses to overcome them in later phase of battle. Warfare tactics: The actual combat involved hand to hand battles, shock battles and use of war machinery that threw arrows, stones and fireballs as missiles to enemy army lines. Usually the attack was initiated by Roman war machines where they barraged d opposing army with arrows, spears, and heavy stones. Subsequent to this, heavy infantry was first unit to enter main battle foray and engaged opposition soldiers through hand to hand combat. As fighting units were progressively injured and worn out, they withdrew back into the cushion of three tier structure and they were replaced by fresh units to continue battle. Cavalry was largely used for ornamental warfare, were limited in number and did not take extensive partake in warfare. Logistics: Supplying the army with food and other needs was a major challenge for Roman generals, specially on their long campaigns and given the fact that food production and methods of supplies were very nominal in ancient times. Therefore Roman troops carried most of equipment, including their lodging, clothing on animal carts. Their efficient network meanwhile ensured continued supplies of food and fuel to keep army moving. Compared to ancient Roman military system, the medieval warfare presents significant contrasts, especially in terms of military deployment, strategy and battle tactics. Use of gunpowder and missile technology identified the greatest departure from conventional and largely manual methods of conducting war. The rise of pillage warfare, where armies of one state looted and pillaged other states for purpose of supplies led rise to fortification and siege warfare Army Layout: Medieval army layout deployed long range heavy and light canons in the front line, supported by archers and heavy cavalry that formed main mass of army. Cavalry formed the main fighting force of the army, that comprised men mounted on horses, ready to give charge to enemy flanks. Knights, mounted soldiers with special military training formed an important part of cavalry ranks. Warfare Tactics: Medieval warfare tactics employed extensive use of canons and, towards later age, use of guns to start the first volley of assault. This was followed by charge of cavalry units. Use of horses had given lightening striking potentials to European armies and they used this advantage to launch rapid waves of attacks. In the medieval warfare, role of infantry had been relatively marginalized and their prime purpose was to act as support units at times of large scale siege and inundation of enemy fortification Battle of Cannae Battle of Cannae is considered one of most important ancient military events that is still widely studied and taught in military schools. The battle was part of second Punic war, and it was fought under Carthaginian Hannibal against the might of Roman Empire in 216 century BC. The Roman army was numerically much more superior and had better terrain than army of Hannibal and had enough time to prepare for the oncoming battle. Yet, Hannibal successfully overwhelmed the opposition and handed one of most comprehensive defeat to Roman army in its heydays. The combined Roman and Carthaginian forces combating in battle exceeded 1,40,000: Romans at near 850000, and Carthaginian forces totaling 55000. On the day of battle, Roman generals arranged their army in traditional three rank structure, with infantry placed in center and cavalry placed at side flanks to provide cover. The arrangement displayed traditional Roman affinity for depth, and they planned to use their deployment to cut through center of Hannibal’s forces.   However, the fact that Roman generals had opted for depth, rather than width meant that both armies same frontal appearance, negating the visual aspect of Roman numerical strength. The armies of Hannibal were also at apparent disadvantage with Aufidus River cutting off their chances of Retreat. The entire strategy of Roman generals was based on their previous experience of skirmishes and combats with Hannibal, whom they knew to be a resourceful, and cunning tactician. Hannibal was also ware of weaknesses of his army and the fact that both armies were meeting in open battlefield did not provide him to plan for any possible ambush or surprise maneuver. But Hannibal was also well aware of strengths and weaknesses of his different units and he deployed them strategically at flanks to make their best use. The Roman army moved forward en masse while Hannibal extended his army in line formation providing greater flexibility and inner movement within army flanks.Hannibal used his superior cavalry to defeat and push behind inferior Roman cavalry and then outflank them to attack Roman rear. The pincer movement created panic in Roman flanks and their front lines started to fall on back lines where Carthaginian cavaliers eliminated them. This caused the rear lines to push towards center, creating massive confusion among Roman soldiers. The combined Roman push towards their own center allowed created a situation where they got extremely densely packed, not even leaving them sufficient them to reform, regroup or maneuver their weapons. Meanwhile Carthaginian army had completely encircled Roman forces, and started cutting them down to virtually last man. The battle is still recounted as one with highest number of causalities in a single day. A number of factors contributed to victory of Hannibal, including his superior analysis of situation and his clever use of cavalry and infantry. Hannibal converted the disadvantage of having a river at back to advantage in pushing ahead his forces with full knowledge that Romans could not at least outflank his infantry. Meanwhile, Roman army could retreat through only its left flank, its other retreating chances cut off by Mountains at one side and River at other. Ultimately Romans were left with no chance to escape and Hannibal accomplished one of the greatest military feat in history. Reference Richard A. Gabriel. Donald W. Boose Jr.1994.   The Great Battles of Antiquity: A Strategic and Tactical Guide to Great Battles That Shaped the Development of War. Greenwood Press. Westport, CT. John France. 1999. Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades, 1000-1300.   . UCL Press. London. Richard A. Preston, Sydney F. Wise, Herman O. Werner. 1956. History of Warfare and Its Interrelationships with Western Society. Frederick A. Praeger.: New York. Roger Beaumont . 1994. War, Chaos and History. Praeger. Place of Publication: Westport, CT. How to cite Military strategist and conflict, Essay examples

Effect Of Trans-Pacific Partnership Without United - myassignmenthelp

Question: Writeabout theEffect Of Trans-Pacific Partnership Without United. Answer: Introduction The study focuses on effect of trans pacific partnership with or without USA. Trans pacific partnership refers to a free trade agreement among 12 countries that includes Canada, Chile, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Vietnam, US, Australia, Singapore, Peru and Brunei. The parties under TPP agreed to reduce non tariff barriers as well as tariffs on industrial and agricultural goods. Now, the present president of US has withdrew US from this TPP and this affected the both the consumers as well as producers in the nation. This report however reflects on the impact of US consumers, producers, effect on tariff , demand and supply in agriculture industries. Effect of Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) with or without USA Impact on US consumers TPP will adversely impact on the US consumer if the partnership moves without this nation. It will not protect as well as promote freedom of their choice and will lower the security as well as privacy of the US consumer (Petri and Plummer 2012). In addition, it will increase the cost of the products that is mainly consumed by consumers of this nation. Even, the US consumers will not reap any benefits from advancement of technology and innovation of products in the market. As TPP allows the US consumers in choosing innovative technologies that is available in global market in order to protect their security, exclusion of this nation from TPP will adversely affect the US consumers. Moreover, it will stop allowing the consumers in utilizing devices in various markets. Impact on US producers If the USA withdraws from the Trans Pacific Partnership, then the effects on the production statistics of the USA will not be favorable too. The Agreement of free trade being the biggest of the free trade agreement, currently existing in the international scenario, as discussed above is meant to facilitate free trading between the different countries across the world (Williams 2013). Therefore, if the USA withdraws from this agreement or if the agreement is carried out without the inclusion of the country, then this may have negative implications on the external sector of the country, which in its turn is expected to have negative implications on the overall production statistics of the country. If the country is not included in the agreement, then trading will be difficult on part of the country as it will not be entitled to the privileges that the countries in the agreement is entitled to have (Gordon 2012). Trading, as a result, will become costly as the country will have to face trade barriers and tariff restrictions in other countries. This will in its turn discourage the domestic producers to produce more as they will be losing incentives to do so. Thus, the country will be suffering from loss of productivity as a whole. Impact on consumer of the 11 non-US parties to the TPP USA is one of the primary economies in the international business scenarios and the primary producers and the second largest exporter in the world, with the primary exports being crude oil, petroleum and automobiles. Then the exclusion of the country from the TPP, will have negative implications on the international consumers, especially those demanding the products in which the USA has economies of scale. The consumers will not get those commodities, especially crude oil, at the desired price, which will in turn affect them adversely. USA being a primary agricultural producer, this will be effecting the global agricultural market and the relevant consumers also adversely, especially those of the consumers in the 11 Non-US parties in the Trans Pacific Agreement. If the country, however, remains included in the concerned free trade agreement, then due to their lower costs and economies of scale, in the production of the above mentioned commodities, the global Non-US customers will be benefitted. Impact on producer of the 11 non-US parties to the TPP The USA being one of the biggest exporter in the international trade scenario, if the country no longer remains a part of the Trans Pacific Partnership, then it will be no longer be eligible for the benefits of the free trading among the different countries. This will, in its turn, increase the global export prices of the commodities and services that the country exports, as it has to face the tariff regulations and restrictions in this case (Flynn et al. 2012). Thus, this disadvantage on part of the concerned country will increase the benefits of the Non-US producers, especially those who venture in the same markets as that of the USA. With the absence of the USA from the free trade agreement, these producers will enjoy greater market shares in the international scenario, which will enable them to export more and enjoy greater revenues as well as economies of scale. However, this may adverse those producers who import commodities or services from the USA as a part of their production process, including raw materials and technologies. The exclusion of the country from the free trade agreement, can increase the price of these products too, thereby making import as well as production costly for the producers, thereby affecting them quite adversely. Elasticity of the demand and supply curve in the Agriculture industries Tariff refers to the taxes that is imposed on the goods that are imported and this automatically increases the product price in the market. In this situation, as US has to provide tariff on agriculture goods, the supply of goods will automatically reduce (Capling and Ravenhill 2012). As a result, the price of the agriculture commodities will rise and demand curve will become inelastic. As the prices rises for the agriculture products, the consumers will purchase less goods and hence this will affect on their standard of living. This is shown in the diagram below: Figure 1: Effect on demand and supply curve in the agricultural industries Source: (As created by author) The effects of a tariff without TPP for Australia As TPP is the agreement of reduction of tariffs on agricultural as well as industrial products, there will adverse effect on the goods if US moves out of this TPP deal (Cheong, 2013). Without TPOP, tariff will increase and hence this will decline business opportunities in the nation. However, as tariff increases on goods, competition among the business reduces and trade also decreases. In Australia, tariff is already low(approx 5%) and hence increase in tariff will affect on the economic growth of this nation. Consequences on Efficiency at the global level The efficiency in the global level will decrease and this would adversely affect on the economic growth of the other 11 countries as US moves out of TPP deal. Moreover, the countries that are not included under TPP experiences mixed impact because some nations will lose their efficiency in trade owing to diversion of trade from their markets. However, many countries will move out of trade agreement and hence this will reduce their nations income. Will the US eliminates trade deficit by withdrawing from the TPP and imposing trade restrictions. US will definitely eliminate trade deficit by withdrawing from TPP and hence will impose trade restrictions (Capaldo et al. 2016). The nation will impose trade restrictions in order to protect the business organizations as well as laborers in the economy from the competition of international companies. On the other hand, import restrictions might discourage protected entities in this nation and hence this will influence on their efficiency as well as management. Thus, they will become more dependent on US governmental support for surviving in the competitive market. Conclusion It can be concluded from the above assignment that if US president withdraws the nation from the TPP deals, then this might adversely influence on their economic growth. Even other countries will also be affected by this decision of the US president. References Capaldo, J., Izurieta, A. and Sundaram, J.K., 2016.Trading down: unemployment, inequality and other risks of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement(No. 16-01). GDAE, Tufts University. Capling, A. and Ravenhill, J., 2012. The TPP: multilateralizing regionalism or the securitization of trade policy.The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement, p.279. Cheong, I., 2013. Negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement: Evaluation and implications for East Asian regionalism. Flynn, S.M., Baker, B.K., Kaminski, M.E. and Koo, J., 2012. The US proposal for an intellectual property chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Gordon, B.K., 2012. Trading Up in Asia: Why the United States Needs the Trans-Pacific Partnership.Foreign Affairs, pp.17-22. Lim, C.L., Elms, D.K. and Low, P. eds., 2012.The trans-pacific partnership: a quest for a twenty-first century trade agreement. Cambridge University Press. Petri, P.A. and Plummer, M.G., 2012. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications. Williams, B.R., 2013. Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) countries: comparative trade and economic analysis.